Nur eine Warnung, dass die RHS-Website verwendet jetzt eine "KI-generierte Antwort" wenn du suchst. Also, und das war ehrlich gesagt meine erste Suche, eine Suche nach "Physocarpus-Hauptversammlung" kommt zurück mit "Die Gattung Physocarpus, einschließlich Arten wie Physocarpus opulifoliusverfügt derzeit über keine Einträge, die mit dem Award of Garden Merit (AGM) ausgezeichnet sind." In der Zwischenzeit können Sie es an anderer Stelle auf der Website finden Physocarpus opulifolius Dame in Rot/details), die tatsächlich eine Hauptversammlung hat. Daher ist es wahrscheinlich am besten, mit den Suchergebnissen vorsichtig zu sein. Etwas frustrierend, aber es scheint, dass die Welt so läuft.
Von: madjackslam
15 Comments
The only garden-related enshittification I’d approve of is manure for soil improvements… Direct search appears to be safe for now though [https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/search-form](https://www.rhs.org.uk/plants/search-form)
I’d love to ask whoever made this decision what benefit they believe they’re bringing to the table by spending money on this.
The RHS website was shit even before that, slow to load and didn’t have the relevant information. I always use one of the commercial nurseries like Crocus or Burncoose or one of the specialist tree nurseries to get the info I need about plants.
That makes me feel sick. They’re deliberately, consciously choosing to contribute to climate change. Everyone should complain using the form someone linked to. I’m embarrassed to be an RHS member right now.
I need to find some plaints
Yay now we have A.I slop for gardening
How completely unnecessary and ridiculous. Why on earth would anyone EVER need an AI function on their website. On any website!
The fact that they have a section on their website about “sustainable gardening” is a direct contradiction when they’re now using AI.
Every single person at RHS which has led to this being on their website is directly complicit in encouraging the destruction of the planet, and I’m not exaggerating. Why on earth the “gardening charity of the UK” thought this would EVER be a good idea is genuinely baffling.
How disappointing.
https://tenor.com/bkGuI.gif
That’s so shit 🙁 thanks for letting us know!
I’m not saying you should but you can make it generate a new AI reponse, costing money/tokens….
Each promp response is saved e.g. `cabbage` and the original response when someone searched cabbage is saved.
But if you searched `cabbage4` then it’d generate a new response and then save it.
It has some logic built in so that it’ll only generate responses if the search term is *planty*
You could, theortically, make a script that searches cabbage1-1000 and make it generate 1000 prompt responses
How on EARTH is AI being used when it’s actively decimating the environment and forcing people to RATION THEIR WATER?!
If only there was a super-efficient search tool that indexed websites and that websites could integrate so that users could easily find what they want…
I’m not averse to ai, I can see it’s uses, but breaking what wasn’t broken is annoying!
Based, can’t wait for the anti ai crowd to eat their own hats in the years to come
Where does it state they are using AI for search I am missing it? Edit: found it!
I used google last night and it gave me four search response, 5 adverts and a lengthy and incorrect AI response.